Skip to main content
Sarah Mitchell — watercolor artist and palette reviewer
verified

Sarah Mitchell

Verified Reviewer

Watercolor artist · Painting since 2015 · Portland, Oregon

I test watercolor palettes using a documented 6-step protocol — calipers, lightfast swatches, field sessions, the works. All products are purchased with my own money. I paint landscapes and botanical studies, mostly plein air. I started this site after buying four “top-rated” palettes that were genuinely bad.

draw10+ years painting
science15+ palettes tested
verified_userAll products purchased
publicPlein air in 8 countries
photo_cameraInstagram PortfoliomailSend a Message

How I got here

I picked up watercolor in 2015, working through a secondhand copy of Jean Haines’ World of Watercolourwith a Winsor & Newton Cotman set I found at a local art store. I painted every day for three months before I touched a real pigment. That gap — student grade tools while learning a professional skill — gave me a very clear sense of how much the equipment actually matters.

By 2018 I was painting plein air regularly. I spent two weeks in Provence painting with a group organized through a Portland arts center, carrying a Sakura Koi and a travel journal. I went through four palettes in three years trying to find one I actually liked — one leaked in my bag in Lyon, one lost two pans on a train in Vietnam, one turned my mixed colors grey no matter what I did. I started taking notes.

In 2022 I started doing more systematic testing — documenting what I was using, why I switched, and what specifically made each palette better or worse. By 2025 I had notes on 15+ palettes and a testing process I trusted. This site is where I publish them.

The domain is spelled “pallete” (one ‘t’, one ‘e’) — that’s a deliberate choice to capture the common search misspelling. The content always uses the correct spelling: palette.

What I actually paint

Mostly landscapes — coastal Oregon, Pacific Northwest forests, the occasional European street scene from travel sketchbooks. I paint botanicals when I’m stuck indoors: single stems on hot-press paper, close-up petals, seed pods. I’ve been doing a series of tidal pool paintings on Fabriano Artistico hot press for the past year.

I work at a desk in my apartment and plein air about twice a month when weather allows. Plein air is where most of my equipment frustrations happen — that’s where palettes drop, lids don’t close right, and mixing areas turn useless in direct sun. Those sessions inform most of the travel palette reviews on this site.

My current studio palette

Ceramic John Pike palette · 20 wells · Updated January 2026

Hansa Yellow Light

PY3 · M. Graham

New Gamboge

PY153 · Daniel Smith

Quinacridone Rose

PV19 · Holbein

Pyrrol Scarlet

PR255 · Daniel Smith

Ultramarine Blue

PB29 · Holbein

Phthalo Blue (GS)

PB15:3 · M. Graham

Phthalo Green (BS)

PG7 · Daniel Smith

Raw Sienna

PY42 · M. Graham

Burnt Sienna

PR101 · Holbein

Burnt Umber

PBr7 · Winsor & Newton

Neutral Tint

PBk7 + PB15 · Winsor & Newton

Titanium White (gouache)

PW6 · M. Graham

I mix brands deliberately — best pigment wins, not brand loyalty. Want to know how I chose these? Read my palette setup guide →

Testing methodology

Every palette reviewed on this site goes through the same 6-step process before I write a word. Total time from opening the box to publishing: approximately 6 weeks.

1

Initial documentation

Photography, weight (Ohaus digital scale ±0.1g), and well depth measured with Mitutoyo calipers at three points per well. I record the mixing area dimensions and note the surface material before any paint is applied.

2

Bead-up test

Five drops of clean water applied to each mixing surface. I time how long until the water spreads flat. Ceramic typically passes immediately. Untreated plastic forms domes that persist until disturbed. This test predicts how the palette will behave with dilute washes.

3

Pigment density comparison

I mix the same pigment (usually PB29 Ultramarine, which is in almost every set) at a 1:4 paint-to-water ratio from each palette, applied to the same paper in the same stroke length. Swatches are photographed under consistent lighting and compared.

4

48-hour and 10-day rewet tests

After the first session, the palette is closed and left undisturbed for 48 hours. I then open it and count how many brush strokes it takes to achieve usable paint flow with no pre-misting. The same test is repeated after 10 days. Palettes that need 10+ strokes fail this test.

5

Field session

Minimum one 2-hour outdoor session painting from observation. I paint standing when possible — that replicates real plein air conditions where you're holding the palette or resting it on a forearm. I note closure security, pan stability, and whether the mixing area stays usable in sun.

6

Lightfast assessment

Color swatches from each set are pinned in indirect south-facing window light for 4 weeks alongside reference swatches stored in a dark drawer. Swatches showing visible fading at 4 weeks would fail at 6 months of normal display. I note every color that shifts and include it in the review.

Equipment used for testing

Consistent tools across every review. If I test a ceramic palette and a plastic one on different paper, the paper is a variable. Everything below stays the same across reviews.

Paper (hot press)Arches 140lb, Fabriano Artistico 140lb
Paper (cold press)Fabriano Artistico 140lb, Saunders Waterford 140lb
Brushesda Vinci Casaneo 498 size 10, Silver Black Velvet size 8 round
MeasurementMitutoyo 500-196-30 digital calipers (±0.01mm)
Spray bottleIwata-Medea spray bottle (0.2mm nozzle for consistent misting)
Lightfast testIndirect window light, south-facing, 4 weeks, reference swatches stored in dark
ScaleOhaus Scout Pro digital scale (±0.1g)

Independence & transparency

Editorial policy

I don’t accept free products in exchange for reviews. Everything on this site was purchased at retail price or borrowed from artist colleagues with no agreement of coverage. A brand reaching out does not move a product up the list. A bad lightfast score does, downward.

I earn a commission when you buy through my Amazon affiliate links (tag: ecomseo02-20). Amazon sets the commission rate by category — it’s the same regardless of which product you buy. I have no financial incentive to rank one product above another.

The Ohuhu set is ranked last in my palette review because several pigments faded in 4 weeks of indirect light. That’s not a rating I wanted to give — it’s a popular product with thousands of Amazon reviews. But that’s what I found.

Read the full affiliate disclosure →

What this site covers

What I don’t test

I test palettes, not every watercolor paint brand. I use a small set of reference pigments consistently so the palette — not the paint — is the variable. If I’m reviewing a pre-filled set, I test the paints as they come; but I don’t separately review individual tubes or pans.

I’m one person. I have tested 15+ palettes through the full protocol as of April 2026. Products I haven’t personally tested don’t appear in my reviews — I won’t write about something based on Amazon reviews or press materials.

I don’t test for children’s art safety compliance (AP certification, ASTM D-4236) — I note whether a product carries those certifications, but I don’t independently verify them. For kids’ palettes, I defer to the certification listed on the product.

Get in touch

If there’s a palette I haven’t reviewed, a rating you disagree with, or something I got wrong, I want to hear it. I read every email and usually respond within 48 hours.

mailcontact@bestwatercolorpallete.com@sarahmitchellart